Clutter reduction in composite-text display

ABSTRACT

A rendering engine and method for reducing character clutter in display of composite text formed from a first text string and a second text in a single viewing field. The composite text having foreign language text and truncated translation characters of the foreign language in which the foreign language text is embedded in area vacated by truncation of translation character strokes to enable readers to identify translation text based on remaining distinguishing character strokes with reduction of eye shift between the two text strings.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to rendering engines displaying two texts of associated content as a composite text in a single viewing field to reduce eye fatigue from prolonged eye shift between the texts. Such displace schemes typically suffer from character clutter that complicate reading ease.

Therefore, there is a need for reducing character clutter in composite text display.

SUMMARY

According to the teachings of the present invention there is provided a method a method for displaying a composite text string performed on a computer having a processor, memory, and one or more code sets stored in the memory and executed in the processor, the method including: receiving a string of foreign text characters; obtaining a translation text of the foreign-language content; rendering the translation text into truncated translation characters;

embedding the foreign text characters in area vacated through truncation of the translation text of the foreign text characters; and displaying a composite text of the foreign text characters and the truncated characters, the foreign text characters embedded in the area vacated through truncation of the translation text of the foreign text characters.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the plurality of the truncated translation characters include at least one discriminatory, character stroke.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the at least one discriminatory, character stroke spans a width of the truncated character.

According to a further feature of the present invention, a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character x-height and a second stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character baseline.

According to a further feature of the present invention, a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character baseline.

According to a further feature of the present invention, a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character x-height.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the truncated translation characters are implemented in a color lighter than the foreign text characters.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the truncated characters are displayed in gray.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the color lightens in accordance with reader usage.

There is also provided according to the teachings of the present invention, a rendering engine for reducing clutter in composite-text display, the engine including: an input device configured to capture foreign language content; a processor operative to: render the foreign-language content into foreign text characters, obtain a translation text of the foreign-language content, render the translation text into a string of truncated translation characters; embed the foreign text characters in space vacated through truncation of the

translation character of the translation text; and an output device configured to display a composite text of the foreign text characters and the truncated characters, the foreign text characters embedded in the space vacated through truncation of the translation text.

According to a further feature of the present invention, a plurality of the truncated translation characters include at least one discriminatory, character stroke.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the at least one discriminatory, character stroke spans a width of the truncated character.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke at is disposed at a height bound by a character x-height and a second stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is disposed at a height bound by a character baseline.

According to a further feature of the present invention, a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character baseline.

According to a further feature of the present invention, a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character x-height.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the truncated translation text is implemented in a font size smaller than that of the foreign text characters.

According to a further feature of the present invention, wherein the area vacated through truncation of the translation text is bordered.

According to a further feature of the present invention, the input device is implemented as a microphone or a camera

According to a further feature of the present invention, the output device is implemented as a printer or a display screen.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. Invention components, features, their interaction, operation, and advantages are best understood with reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings in which:

FIGS. 1A-1C are various sample of prior art requiring constant eye shift between a foreign-language text and a translation disposed either to the side, underneath, or both;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a rendering engine, according to an embodiment;

FIGS. 3A-3D are various samples of framing characters depicted in reference grids highlighting receiving regions disposed within counters of the framing characters, according to an embodiment;

FIGS. 4A-4B depict various, horizontal placement options of center content within English translation-framing characters, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 4C depicts a center character and its side bearings between the character and the boundaries of the receiving region within which the character is disposed; according to an embodiment. Accordingly, adjacent side bearings of contiguous receiving regions define spacing between center characters. It should be appreciated that the cumulative space of the two side bearings is reduced by overlay of a framing character disposed in between the two receiving regions as will be further discussed.

FIG. 5 depicts various rendering stages of a sample Spanish foreign-language text and English framing characters into a composite text string, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 6 depicts rendering stages of a sample English translation characters disposed in associated Hebrew framing characters into a composite text string, according to an embodiment;

FIGS. 7A-7B depict an alternative, configuration option of FIG. 5 in which counters of the Hebrew framing characters are partitioned into four receiving regions, shown within a reference grid and in the absence of the reference grid, respectively, according to an embodiment;

FIGS. 8A-8C depict composite text renderings of FIG. 7B in which the center characters are displayed with color and treatment variations, according to an embodiment;

FIGS. 9A-9B depict gridded and non-gridded stages, respectively, of an alternative embodiment of the composite text of FIG. 8B in which center characters are disposed in the body of framing characters, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 9C depicts a composite-text, display scheme employing proportional font embedded within Hebrew framing characters, according to a variant embodiment;

FIG. 9D depicts a composite-text, display scheme employing broken-lined framing characters, according to a variant embodiment;

FIG. 9E depicts a composite-text, display scheme for an advertisement and scoreboard, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 9F depicts a display scheme employing pictorial content embedded within framing letters, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 9G depicts a composite-text, display schemes for date, and time, and FIG. 9H depicts a composite-text, display scheme for time and alarm, according to variant embodiments;

FIG. 9I depicts a composite-text, display scheme for an advertisement of article for purchase and its price, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 10A is a flowchart depicting process steps of the rendering engine of FIG. 2 implementing a counter-filling display scheme for a composite-text in which monofont characters fill framing character counters, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 10B is a flowchart depicting process steps of the rendering engine of FIG. 2 implementing a counter-filling display scheme for a composite-text in which proportional characters fill framing character counters, according to a variant embodiment;

FIG. 11A depicts a composite-text, display scheme for spell checker in which characters of a misspelled word are framed by characters of the correctly spelled version, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 11B depicts a flow chart of processing steps implementing the display scheme of the spell checker of FIG. 11A, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 12A depicts a composite-text, display scheme of a vanity telephone number in, according to a variant embodiment;

FIG. 12B depicts a flow chart of processing steps implementing the display scheme of the vanity telephone number of FIG. 12A, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 13A depicts a composite-text, display scheme for cursive and printing styles, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 13B depicts a composite-text, display scheme for currency exchange rates, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 14 depicts a variable composite-text display scheme in which an counter-filling scheme automatically changes to a stroke-embedding scheme responsively to excessive overlap between the two texts, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 15 is a flow chart depicting process steps of the rendering engine of FIG. 2 implementing a stroke embedding display-scheme for a composite text in which characters are embedded within vertical strokes of framing character, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 16A depicts a composite-text, display scheme for a cluster sentence employing adapted framing characters, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 16B depicts the composite-text, display scheme of FIG. 16A with non-adapted framing characters;

FIG. 16C depicts a flowchart of processing steps implementing the display scheme of the cluster sentence of FIG. 16A;

FIG. 17A depicts a composite-text, display scheme in which a foreign text is implemented as an embedded text and its core translation is displayed as a same-line, framing text while non-core translation is displayed as above-line display, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 17B depicts a flow chart of processing steps implementing the display scheme of FIG. 17A, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 18 is a listing of lowercase English letters and sample distinguishing character strokes that can be used to distinguish one character from another; according to an embodiment;

FIG. 19 depicts a composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a truncation area sandwiched between upper and lower discriminatory character strokes of the associated truncated translation text, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 20 depicts a composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a truncation area above the discriminatory character strokes of the associated truncated translation text, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 21 depicts a composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a truncation area below discriminatory character strokes of the truncated translation text, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 22 depicts a composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a truncation area below discriminatory character strokes of the associated truncated translation text in a font size smaller than that of the foreign text, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 23 depicts a composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a bordered truncation area below discriminatory character strokes of the truncated translation text, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 24 depicts a composite text analogous to FIG. 19 in which English is treated as a foreign language text and Hebrew is treated as a truncated translation text, according to an embodiment; and

FIG. 25 is a flow chart depicting processing steps employed in the implementation of display schemes embedding foreign language text within a truncation area of a translation text, according to an embodiment.

It will be appreciated that for the sake of clarity, elements shown in the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale and reference numerals may be repeated among figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description sets forth various details to provide a thorough understanding of the invention and it should be appreciated, by those skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. Furthermore, well-known methods, procedures, and components have been omitted to highlight the present invention.

As noted, the current invention is a rendering engine directed to displaying a two separate content strings in a single text line in a manner complying with readability and legibility requirements.

Following are terms to be used throughout this document:

“Input text” or “input language” refers to a text string input to the system. Text includes numbers, letters, symbols, and acronyms in accordance with language conventions.

“English is considered the translation language for the purposes of this document. It should be appreciated that a language is deemed to be a foreign-text entirely on the basis of user preference and the present rendering engine provides user configurability to enable users to define the language to be treated as a foreign language and the language to be treated as a translation language.

“Typeface and “character” refer to the actual letter body.

A “font” is a typeface rendered in a treatment, weight, and size. For example, a “Times New Roman typeface rendered with italic treatment, bold weight, and 12 pt size is a Times New Roman, italic bold 12 pt” font. In addition to these font parameters, the font also includes a side bearing around the typeface set by the font designer. Font data includes this data for these parameters and spacing parameters.

“Framing character” refers to a character enclosing region of sufficient area to contain one or more receiving regions. Enclosing two or more complete sides is deemed to be enclosing.

“Counter” refers to an area enclosed on at least two sides by a framing character with an area of sufficient size to enclose one or more receiving regions.

In a certain embodiment, the counter of each framing character is implemented with the same width. In another embodiment, the counter width of framing characters is word specific and can vary on a word by word basis.

“Center text” or “center characters” refers to characters disposed within receiving regions; either inside framing-character counters, in-between framing characters, or both inside and in-between framing characters simultaneously. Center characters shifted vertically or horizontally from the center of a receiving region are still deemed to be a center character if minimally enclosed by a framing character.

“Framing character spacing” refers to intra-word spacing between framing characters, in a certain embodiment. It is defined by one or more widths of the receiving regions in accordance with configuration preferences. For example, the spacing between framing letters is configurable as one, two, or three receiving regions. In another embodiment, intra-word spacing is defined by unfilled receiving regions within counters of framing characters contacting each other.

Inter-word spacing of framing characters between words is greater than the intra-word spacing of framing characters, in accordance with configuration preferences. It should be noted that these are minimum inter-word spacing of framing characters. In certain situations when the number of center characters exceeds the number of receiving regions available within a framing word, the spacing between framing words will be increased by the number of receiving regions necessary to receive the center characters.

“Center character spacing” refers to the spacing between center characters within words and is defined by side bearings built into the font file of the center character by font designers, in a certain embodiment. The juxtaposition of side bearings of adjacent center characters provides natural spacing by aligning the advance width of the center characters with the points of division defining receiving region boundaries, as will be further discussed. In a certain embodiment, negative side bearings are employed to define spacing between center characters when the center characters are implemented as script.

Truncation refers to removing one or more character strokes to reduce character clutter. As noted, traversing characters may add legibility and therefore enable a reader to discern one character from another even if a portion of the character is absent. In certain embodiment, truncation may also refer to removal of ascenders or descenders.

Discriminatory character strokes (Also called distinguishing character strokes) refer to character strokes that may distinguish one character from another even in the absence of a portion of the character strokes as will be further discussed in the context of FIG. 18.

In a certain embodiment, the center characters are justified to achieve alignment of the advance width of center characters with demarcation points dividing a display space into receiving regions.

In a certain embodiment, the center characters are implemented as kerning-modified side bearings defining center character spacing within cell boundaries.

It should be noted that although all embodiments depict display schemes employing horizontal counter-filling or counter stroke embedding, in a certain embodiment vertical counter filling or counter stroke embedding are employed.

Turning now to the figures, FIGS. 1A-1C depict various types of prior art directed at providing a translation to a foreign-language text. As shown, in FIG. 1A the translation is presented as a separate text line disposed to the side of the foreign-language text whereas in FIG. 1B the translation is disposed underneath the foreign text, and in FIG. 1C the translation is presented both to the side and underneath of the foreign-language text. As previously noted, all of these display configurations whether displayed as virtual text on a display screen or as printed text all fatigue the reader because of required eye shift.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of rendering engine 1 configured to display two or more text strings as a composite text in a single line. It should be noted that for the purposes of this document a series of pictures is deemed to be a content string.

In a certain embodiment, the rendering engine 1 includes at least one processor 2 and input devices 3 including a microphone 4 for speech capture, a camera 5 for visual text capture, a keyboard 6, and a mouse 7. Output devices 3A include a display screen 9 in any of the various forms associated with computing devices, and a printer 10. Engine 1 also includes a network interface 11 for network enablement. It should be appreciated that processing may be implemented either locally or remotely via various forms of wireless or wired networking technologies or a combination of both.

Memory 12 includes various types of short and long-term memory as is known in the art. Memory 12 is loaded with various applications or algorithms including optical character recognition module 14 for rendering captured text images into text, a speech recognition module 15 for rendering recorded speech into foreign-language text, a correlation module 16 for accessing various types of content strings in accordance with the particular application, and a text rendering module 17 for displaying a composite text in a single text string as will be further discussed. Memory 12 also includes a database 18 of input first-string text data 19 and second-string content data 19C. Second-string content may be linked to input data as a semantic linkage, currency equivalence, pricing, advertising material, writing style, telephone numbers, dates, time, and pictorial content, for example. Framing character data 19A of adapted framing characters having required counter geometries enabling composite-text display. Data file 19B is loaded with pre-defined truncated translation characters in which various character fonts are removed but possess discriminatory character strokes enabling a reader to identify the truncated characters from other characters and understand the translation text, as will be further discussed.

Engine 1 is operative to employ various font technologies like raster, vector, TrueType, and Microsoft OpenType and database 18 also includes associated font-resource files.

It should be appreciated that in a certain embodiment, translation module 16 is configurable to translate various foreign languages into either English or other chosen languages. Accordingly, database 18 includes all necessary content and in a certain embodiment is implemented locally whereas in another embodiment it is implemented remotely. It should be appreciated that pre-translated content is also stored with translation data and is employed when processing text in which pre-translated content is available, according to an embodiment.

FIGS. 3A-3D depict various, sample framing characters having a standardized typeface geometry forming a counter width equal to an integer multiple of receiving region widths, with an area within the counter devoid of a traversing stroke so as to enable and having height sufficient to receive receipt of ascenders or descenders of center characters within the receiving regions without contacting the framing characters, in a certain embodiment. It should be noted that the reference grid highlights a series of monospace demarcations in a display space defining placement of receiving regions and is shown as a grid to highlight the basis of a spacing scheme; the grid is absent when the composite-text is displayed.

Specifically, FIG. 3A depicts sample English framing characters in a reference grid highlighting two receiving regions 22 within the counter of each of the English framing characters. As shown, each of the two receiving regions 22 between reference lines 20 and counter median 21 have widths that are fractions of the counter width highlighted by reference lines 20. It should be appreciated that, generally, the cumulative width of receiving regions is substantially equal to the width of the counters of the framing characters.

FIG. 3B depicts sample Hebrew framing characters in a reference grid highlighting two receiving regions 26 within each of the Hebrew framing characters. Here too, each of the two receiving regions 26, between reference lines 23 and counter median 24 have a width which is fraction of the counter width. Horizontal reference lines 25 depict a necessary geometry requirement of the framing character to provide sufficient height in the receiving region to receive a center character in the absence of contact between an ascender or descender with the framing letter.

FIG. 3C depicts sample Hebrew framing characters in a reference grid analogous to the sample depicted in FIG. 3B. As shown, four receiving regions 26 collectively span the counter width highlighted by reference lines 27. Two of the four receiving regions 27 are disposed on each side of counter median 28. In this manner center characters populating receiving regions 27 are offset from the middle of the framing counter. Here too, horizontal reference lines 29 depict a necessary geometry requirement of the framing character to provide sufficient height in the receiving region to receive a center character in the absence of contact between an ascender or descender with the framing letter.

FIG. 3D depicts Hebrew framing characters in a reference grid analogous to the sample depicted in FIG. 3C in which a vertical stroke 30 of the framing has a width substantially equal to the width of any of the three receiving regions whose collective widths span the counter. Vertical stroke 30 includes a window 31 for receipt of a center character to be read together with center characters disposed in other receiving regions. As shown, a portion of the framing letter overlaps side bearings of the center character as will be further discussed.

It should be appreciated that the width of the receiving region also defines the spacing between the framing characters, in a certain embodiment. Alignment between framing and center characters is achieved through the depicted virtual grid highlighting demarcations defining positioning of the receiving regions and framing characters, according to an embodiment. Furthermore, in a certain embodiment, the width of the receiving regions is set by a user or font designer. In another embodiment, the width of the receiving regions is configurable as a fraction of the width of a given framing-character counter. Additionally, it should be appreciated that in a certain embodiment the framing characters are implemented with broken or dashed lines.

FIGS. 4A-4B depict a framing text of English language, Latin framing characters 32 in which a few of the available receiving regions have been populated with center content 32A. Center content 32A is depicted in general terms to highlight the fact that it can be implemented in various foreign languages to the word or the phrase within which it is framed, in accordance with the embodiment. In a certain embodiment, center content 32A is implemented as a translation of the word or phrase associated with the framing characters 32. In another embodiment, center content 32A is implemented as an ideograph or pictogram. In another embodiment, center content 32A is implemented as a picture, whereas in another embodiment it is implemented as an instruction or commentary. In another embodiment, a combination of these content types is employed as a content type mix. This document is directed to the translation of a foreign language text.

As shown in FIG. 4A, some of the receiving regions bound by an element of the framing character are filled and other receiving regions are unfilled. This illustrates a certain configuration employing a fill order in which the receiving regions bound by a framing character are filled prior to other receiving regions.

Accordingly, when the framing character is English, read from left to right, the fill order first populates the receiving regions bound by the left element of the framing character as shown in charters “A”, “o” and “a”. When the framing characters are Hebrew, read from right to left, the receiving regions bound by the right side of the Hebrew framing letter are filled first, as shown in FIG. 6, stage 3, in the word furthermost to the right.

In terms of word placement of the center text within the framing characters, in a default configuration the fill order is operative to center the embedded text in the middle of the framing word as shown in the word “boy”, in a certain embodiment. It should be noted, that the horizontal centering of words formed from centering characters within the associated framing words is a configurable feature, in a certain embodiment.

FIG. 4B depicts a composite-text display in which the center content exceeds the length of the associated word expressed in the framing characters. In such instances, rendering engine 1 is configured to provide as many additional, empty receiving regions between framing words to ensure that translation content is placed within the appropriate framing word or phrase, according to an embodiment.

In another embodiment, engine 1 is configured to reduce the width of the receiving regions responsively to threshold deviation between the number of receiving regions required to contain all center characters associated with the framing characters. This configuration advantageously reduces the number of center characters between words formed by framing characters.

FIG. 4C depicts a typeface and its associated side bearings and cumulative advance width of the side bearings and typeface. As shown, the side bearings are measured from the outer extremities of the typeface as highlighted with the boundingbox. The side bearings embody the ideal spacing between characters providing legibility in which the characters are minimally spaced to facilitate discerning of each separate character and readability in which the characters don't exceed a maximum spacing to facilitate mental association between characters. These minimum and maximum spacing thresholds between center characters are set by the font designer. The instant rendering engine advantageously leverages the side bearing by filling the entire width of a receiving region with the advance width of a center character so that adjacent side bearings set center-character spacing for a legible and readable center text within the framing text, according to an embodiment.

It should be noted that in certain fonts, like scripts for example, the character spacing is set by a negative side bearing as is known to those skilled in the art. That means that the spacing between center characters is not measured from the outermost extremity of the center character, but rather, from the inner boundary of the negative side bearing.

It should be appreciated that in certain an embodiment a portion of a side bearing bordering a framing character can be partially overlaid by a portion of a framing character.

FIG. 5 is a depiction of rendering stages involved in the display of a foreign-language text and its translation into a single composite text, according to an embodiment.

Specifically, in this example, Stage 1 depicts Spanish text 33 received by rendering engine 1 (Shown in FIG. 2) and stage 2 depicts English translation 34 is identified. In this configuration, Spanish characters 33 are treated as center characters and English characters as framing characters. Stage 3 depicts Spanish characters 34 populating the appropriate translation framing letters 34 associated with the English translation in accordance with demarcated receiving regions highlighted here with reference grid 35A. Stage 4 depicts the display of a grid-free, composite text string of the Spanish text enclosed by its English translation as a readable foreign text and translation that can be read in the absence of tiring eye shift associated with typical translations offset from their foreign-language text.

FIG. 6 is also a depiction of rendering stages involved in the display of a foreign-language text and its translation into a single composite text. In the depicted example, Hebrew foreign-language text 37 is treated as the framing text and English translation text is treated as the center text. It should be noted that engine 1 is operative to handle languages read in opposite directions as depicted in this example

Specifically, in this example, stage 1 depicts a sample Hebrew text 37 received by rendering engine 1 (Shown in FIG. 2) and stage 2 depicts an English translation 38 identified. Stage 3 depicts Hebrew characters 37 populated with the appropriate English translation characters 38 in accordance with demarcated receiving regions highlighted here with the reference grid 39A. Stage 4 depicts a grid-free composite text string 40 of Hebrew text enclosing English translation characters 38 at a character spacing in approximation with readability standards for both the framing and center text strings to greatly reduce, if not to entirely eliminate, tiring eye shift associated with typical translations offset from the foreign text.

The noted standardized geometry of the framing characters together with the standardized receiving regions advantageously enable an interchangeability of characters of various writing systems while preserving legibility and readability requirements.

It should be appreciated that in any alphabet there are framing characters like “t”, “f”, and “i” may not be conducive to sufficiently enclosing a region to form a counter, in accordance with typographer design. Such letters are deemed to be counter-free framing characters and adjacent, receiving regions are populated in accordance with translation needs. Framing characters possessing a typeface geometry enclosing two or more complete sides of a receiving region are deemed to have a counter, according to an embodiment. Broken or dashed strokes are treated as solid strokes for the purposes of this document.

FIGS. 7A-7B depict an alternative configuration of that depicted in FIG. 6 with the reference grid and the final display form without the grid, respectively

Specifically, the counter width of the Hebrew framing characters has been divided into four receiving regions as depicted by reference grid 41A. As noted above, the number of receiving regions for a counter of a framing character is an integral multiple equal to or greater than, one. Horizontal markers 41B depict the required height of the receiving regions that must be accommodated by the framing characters to avoid intersect between ascenders and descenders of center characters with the framing characters, according to an embodiment. In another embodiment, center and framing characters contact each other without overlapping.

FIGS. 8A-8C depict variant configurations of that depicted in FIG. 6 in which the center characters are implemented with various, user-selected font parameters.

Specifically, FIG. 8A depicts center characters implemented with an italicized treatment, FIG. 8B depicts center characters implemented with a color differing from that of the framing characters, and FIG. 8C depicts center characters implemented with both italicized treatment and a variant color. It should be appreciated that a wide variety of color, weights, treatments, sizes, and their combination are user-configurable. Analogously, user configuration capabilities also exist for framing characters, according to an embodiment.

It should be appreciated that in a certain embodiment center and framing characters are slanted in their reading direction when they have opposite reading directions. In another variant embodiment, both center and framing characters are slanted in the same direction.

FIGS. 9A-9B depict a variant configuration of that depicted in FIGS. 8A-8B. As shown in FIG. 9A, the framing counter contains three receiving regions, as highlighted with reference grid 47A, within framing characters having a widened vertical stroke equal in width to a receiving region width. A receiving window is disposed within each of the widened vertical strokes for receipt of a center character while all other framing-character geometry requirements are preserved. A portion of the framing character overlays the side bearings of the center characters whose advance width, spanning the stroke width, is effectively diminished by the partial overlay of the framing character. In another configuration, the advance width spans the entirety of the vertical stroke with no framing character overlap of the side bearings and it should be appreciated that the degree of overlay of the side bearings defines the degree of empty space visible within the vertical stroke.

FIG. 9B depicts the final, grid-free display version of FIG. 9A.

FIG. 9C depicts a composite-text display scheme in which the center characters are implemented as proportional fonts. For the sake of highlighting the variable spacing between characters associated with proportion fonts, a reference grid is depicted. It should be appreciated that all embodiments depicted employing a counter filling scheme are implemented with either monofont or proportional font characters in accordance with the embodiment.

FIG. 9D depicts a variant embodiment in which the adapted framing characters are implemented with line breaks. As noted above the space is treated as a single stroke. It should be appreciated that all embodiments depicted may be implemented with either broken, dashed or solid strokes in accordance with the embodiment.

FIG. 9E depicts a composite-text, display scheme in which the scoring of a sporting event is disposed in the counter of framing characters spelling the name of a sponsor, according to an embodiment. As shown, the framing letters may be implemented one color, such as, for example light gray, while the center characters may be implemented in another color, such as, for example, black. Such color schemes generate one level of contrast between the center character and the background and lesser level of contrast between lighter framing colors and the background. This reduced contrast advantageously minimizes mental distraction while viewing the scoring while still providing sufficient visibility when the viewer refocuses attention to the framing content. It should be appreciated that this color scheme is applied to other applications set forth in this document in accordance with application requirements. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other color schemes may be used.

FIG. 9F depicts a display scheme in which the second-string content centered within framing characters is set forth as pictorial content, according to an embodiment. It should be appreciated that in certain embodiment the number of pictures centered within a word formed by framing characters is set in accordance with user configuration. Furthermore, in a certain embodiment the pictorial content is linked to the content set forth by the framing characters.

FIG. 9G, depicts a composite-text, display scheme for date and time in which a date is embedded inside counters of adapted framing characters to advantageously enable one to observe both the time and date and/or alarm in a single glance. It should be appreciated that the composite-text is deemed to be single line as long as all content is disposed within the framing characters. FIG. 9H depicts an analogous composite-text, display scheme in which an alarm time is embedded inside a time.

FIG. 9I depicts a composite-text, display scheme for an advertisement of article for purchase and its price, according to an embodiment.

FIG. 10A depicts a flowchart of steps employed to generate a composite-text, display scheme based on counter-filling of monofont receiving regions in view of rendering engine 1 of FIG. 2.

As shown in step 50A, an input text of a first string of text (also referred to as a first-string text) is received either directly through keyboard 6 from speech recognition module 15 after conversion of speech captured through microphone 4, or from optical character recognition module 14 after conversion from an image captured by camera 5, in accordance with embodiment. In a certain embodiment a user-configured combination of text input methods is employed.

In step 51A, a second-string of content (also referred to as second-string content) that may be related to the first-string text is obtained through correlation module 16. As noted above, correlation module 16 is configurable to generate a correlated or related content to the input text in real time or utilize an existing correlation in second-string content data 19C.

In step 52A, a configuration option is implemented on the basis of user preference setting forth the input text of the first-string text as either a center text or as a framing text.

When the input text is implemented as center characters, processing continues to step 53A where the obtained second-string text is rendered into adapted second-string framing characters and stored as framing character data 19A of database 18. As noted above, framing characters have standardized geometries defining counters with sufficient width and height to accommodate center characters without obscuring framing characters. In a certain embodiment the noted rendering is a matter of replacing the obtained second-string text characters with pre-designed adapted characters.

It should be appreciated that in a variant embodiment, framing character adaptation is achieved through a variable font operative to change the horizontal width of the counter in accordance with counter filling requirements of display schemes employing counter filling.

In step 54A, a series of horizontally spaced demarcations of a display space are designated. These demarcations define placement of receiving regions that can potentially receive input text.

In a certain embodiment, the width of the center characters is pre-defined by a user and the framing characters are designed to enclose a desired number of center characters such that the counter width of the framing character is substantially equal to the cumulative width of the receiving regions.

In an alternative embodiment, the framing characters are pre-designed and the number of receiving regions to be enclosed by framing character counters is selected by a user in accordance with the actual or maximum number of center characters desirable to be displayed within a counter.

Ina certain embodiment the width of the receiving region also defines spacing between framing characters and also spacing between framing words as multiples of the receiving region widths. In another embodiment, unfilled receiving regions enclosed by framing character counters provide spacing between center characters. It should be appreciated that in a certain embodiment, counter widths may vary for different words formed by framing characters whereas in another embodiment, the width of framing counters is substantially identical across all words formed by framing characters.

In step 55A, the identified receiving regions are filled with input text characters. In a certain configuration, character justification is employed. In a certain configuration kerning is applied in accordance with spacing restrictions set by the receiving region boundaries. It should be appreciated that upon filling the designated receiving regions, the input text character is disposed either within an adapted framing character, or in-between a framing character, or both inside and in-between framing characters. In this regard, the terms “within” refers to both enclosed, sandwiched, or both enclosed and sandwiched.

In step 60A, a composite-text string of the input text framed inside correlated or related framing characters is output either on display screen 9, printer 10, or both.

When the input text is implemented as framing characters, processing continues to step 57A where the input text is rendered into adapted first-string framing characters stored in framing character data 19A of database 18. As noted above, framing characters have geometries defining common-width counters with sufficient width and height to receive center characters without being obscured by them. In a certain embodiment the noted rendering is a matter of replacing input text characters with pre-designed adapted characters, as noted above.

Processing steps 57A-60A directed to centering second-string content within adapted first-string framing characters text are analogous to steps 53A-60A directed to centering first-string content input text within adapted second-string framing characters and should be understood accordingly.

It is noted that in step 59A, the identified receiving regions are filled with second-string framing characters in accordance with a fill order priority such that the centered content is both enclosed and sandwiched between framing characters. In certain embodiments, both enclosure and sandwiching is achieved on the same center characters. Furthermore, it should be appreciated that the term filling, in all instances of this document, refers to placing a character into a receiving region regardless of the extent of the width of the center content.

FIG. 10B is a flow chart depicting process steps of the rending engine of FIG. 2 implementing a counter-filling, display scheme for a composite-text in which proportional characters are disposed within adapted framing character counters, according to a variant embodiment.

Specifically, in step 50B an input text of a first-text string (also referred to as a first-string text) is received and in step 51B second-text string content is obtained from database 19C or other sources. In step 52B a decision is made on the basis of user preferences whether the input text is to be displayed in the form of adapted framing characters or as proportional font centered within adapted framing characters.

In analogous steps 53B and 57B the relevant content (either first- or second-string content) is rendered into either adapted first-string framing characters or adapted second-string characters by replacing the characters with adapted framing characters found in database 19A.

In analogous steps 54B and 58B, a series of horizontally spaced demarcations defining counter boundaries of the adapted framing characters is designated.

In analogous steps 55 and 61 a check is performed to evaluate if there exists sufficient space within the designated counter width to receive a proportional character without intersecting the framing counter boundaries

If found that there exists sufficient space, then processing proceeds to either of analogous steps 55 and 61 in which the proportional center character is disposed within the appropriate adapted framing character.

If the answer to the query of analogous steps 55 and 61 is negative, then the proportional character is not placed within the adapted framing character and in step 62 the character is placed in the next available space following the skipped framing character.

In step 64, the resulting composite-text is displayed as either centered proportional content within either adapted first-string adapted characters or adapted second-string adapted characters according to a variant embodiment.

FIG. 11A depicts a composite-text, display scheme for a spell checker in which adapted characters of a correctly spelled word frame characters of a misspelled word to adventurously provide a reader with local single line comparison of the erroneous spelling together with the corrected version to advantageously facilitate memorization of the proper spelling. As shown, the erroneous letter or letters may also be displayed in a different color, like red for example, to highlight the error. The framing is operative to frame one or more erroneous characters together with proper characters in a certain embodiment whereas in another variant embodiment only the erroneous characters are framed. In a certain embodiment, the correct letter is colored to highlight the proper spelling to facilitate memorization of the correct spelling in either the same color the erroneous letter is highlighted or in another color in accordance with configuration guidelines.

FIG. 11B is a schematic flow chart depicting process steps for implementing the spell-checker display scheme of FIG. 11A.

Specifically, in step 70 text having a spelling error is received and in step 71 the error is identified by way of known spelling checking technologies. In step 72 a correctly spelled word or various possibilities are obtained from a database. In step 73 characters of the various options or chosen option are rendered into adapted framing characters. In step 74 one or more letters erroneous letters are framed by the adapted framing characters of the correctly spelled word. In a certain configuration, correctly spelled letters also frame correctly spelled letters of the misspelled word as depicted in FIG. 11A. in step 75, a composite text of the misspelled word together with the corrective framing text is displayed in a single line.

FIG. 12A depicts a composite-text, display scheme for a vanity telephone number and the associated telephone numbers to advantageously provide a reader with a single line display of a phoneword and the telephone numbers forming it.

FIG. 12B is a schematic flow chart depicting process steps implementing the composite-text, display scheme of FIG. 12A.

Specifically, in step 80 a vanity telephone number is received and in step 81 the associated telephone number is obtained from a database containing the alphanumeric associations found on a telephone keypad. In step 82, the letters of the phoneword component of the vanity number are rendered into adapted framing characters. In step 83 the adapted framing characters are filled with the respective number. In step 84 adapted framing characters having a counter enclosed on only two sides is identified. In step 85, the respective number associated with the adapted framing characters having a counter enclosed on only two sides is processed into an embeddable form as will be described. In step 86, the embeddable number is embedded in the vertical stroke of the adapted framing characters having a counter enclosed on only two sides. In step 87, a composite text of the phoneword and the associated telephone numbers is displayed in a single line.

It should be appreciated that the described processing is directed to situations in which the vanity number is configured to be the input text. However, it should be noted that analogous processing is executed when the associated telephone numbers are rendered into adapted framing characters and the phoneword component is centered or embedded into the framing characters.

FIG. 13A depicts a composite-text, display scheme for cursive and printing styles in which the printing style characters are embedded within the cursive style characters to advantageously facilitate learning of cursive, according to an embodiment. In a variant embodiment the cursive style is embedded inside the printing style.

FIG. 13B depicts a composite-text, display scheme for currency exchange rates that advantageously enable one to perceive in a single glance the relevant rates without visually tracing relevant rates as is common when disposed at a distance from each other. This is one sample of many possibilities in which two numbers in any financial analysis can be more easily read since one can view both numbers at one time instead of comparing figures commonly present in separate columns or rows.

In addition to reducing eye movement and fatigue associated with intensive financial analysis, this financial display scheme facilitates mistake reduction emanating from incorrect comparison of financial data by presenting relevant data in a single field of vision.

FIG. 14 depicts steps of an automatic display scheme in which a counter-filling display scheme is automatically replaced with a stroke-embedding scheme responsively to excessive overlap between center and framing characters, according to an embodiment.

As shown, in stage 1, related text is center characters are disposed inside counters of adapted framing characters. In stage 2, the framing characters are reduced in size while the center characters remain the same size by a user providing such configuration parameters. This size reduction creates an untenable situation in which both the center and framing characters are obscured thereby degrading legibility of the composite text.

Rendering engine 1 is configured to change the display scheme from the counter-filling scheme of stage 1 to the stroke-embedding scheme of stage 3 responsively to achieve a threshold degree of interference. A sample threshold is contact between the center and framing letters in four locations within a single word, for example. Such thresholds are configurable.

FIG. 15 is a schematic flow chart depicting process steps for a stroke embedding display scheme to generate a single-line composite text.

In step 80, an input text of a first text string (also referred to as a first-sting text) is received. In step 81, a second-string content is received that may be related to the first string. If related, a user may define the nature of the relationship or correlation. In a certain embodiment the engine identifies the type of correlation between the two strings. In step 83, a processing decision is made whether to process the first string as a content to be centered with framing characters or whether it should be treated as framing characters themselves.

Both options involve analogous steps as described in the context of FIGS. 10A and 10B. Specifically, analogous steps 84 and 87 text characters are rendered into either adapted first-string or second-string framing characters characterized by counters of sufficient height to receive embedded characters within the vertical strokes without obscuring horizontally traversing strokes. As shown, the adapted framing characters have counters of sufficient height to ensure character legibility by providing sufficient height to avoid obscuring substantially horizontally traversing strokes when the related text characters are embedded into the framing character strokes, as noted above.

In analogous steps 85 and 88, the appropriate characters are rendered into embeddable characters by overlaying each character onto an enlarged copy functioning as a background matching the color of the general background. The collective unit of the character overlaying its enlarged duplicate forms an embeddable character appearing to be embedded when disposed on framing letter strokes. In another variant embodiment, the embeddable characters are formed by populating a background-colored strip overlaying text characters to also create an impression that the characters are embedded within framing letter strokes.

In analogous steps 86 and 89, the embeddable characters overlay non-horizontal counter strokes of the adapted framing characters to create the effect of being embedded into the counter strokes without obscuring horizontally traversing strokes, as noted above. It should be noted that in a certain embodiment the adapted counter receives the overlay.

In step 90, the resulting single-line composite text is displayed in any of a variety of output devices as noted above.

It should be appreciated that the above-noted construction methods of embeddable characters are also employed in other display schemes in which the embedded characters are embedded into character strokes of adapted framing characters.

FIG. 16A depicts a display scheme for a sentence a cluster segment displayed as a single-line composite text.

FIG. 16B depicts the cluster sentence of FIG. 16A with non-adapted framing characters and highlights the loss of character legibility from obscurity of the horizontally-traversing, strokes. Visibility of crossbar strokes contributes significantly to character legibility and compensates for loss of clarity resulting from partial obscurity of non-vertical strokes. It should be appreciated that crossbar strokes having a curvature are also deemed to be horizontally-traversing.

It should be appreciated that this legibility preservation scheme applies to all embodiments employing stroke embedding.

FIG. 16C depicts a flowchart of processing steps employed in the composite-text, display scheme for the cluster sentence of FIG. 16A.

Specifically, in step 91 an input text is received and then in step 92 a cluster segment of the text is obtained from a database.

In step 93, the obtained cluster segment is rendered into embeddable content in accordance with either one of the above-described processes.

In step 94, the portion of the text that is not the cluster segment is rendered into adapted framing characters. In step 95, the embeddable cluster segment is embedded into the vertical counter strokes of the adapted framing characters, and in step 96 a composite text of the input text content and the cluster segment is displayed as described above.

It should be noted that processing steps set forth in processing steps of FIG. 15 in a certain embodiment may be implemented with the analogous steps set forth in counter filling embodiments set forth in FIGS. 10A and 10B.

FIG. 17A depicts a display scheme for a composite-text of a foreign language text is disposed within a core translation of the foreign language text and a non-core translation is displayed outside of the composite text, according to an embodiment.

Core translations are translation components that are primary parts of speech like a noun, a verb, or both together; whereas other parts of speech are deemed to be non-core translations. The particular parameter is configurable and may be set by interested parties such as users or manufactures, for example.

FIG. 17B depicts a flow chart of processing steps employed to achieve the display scheme of FIG. 17A, according to an embodiment.

Specifically, in step 100 an input text in the form of a foreign language is received and in step 101 a translation is obtained. In step 102, a core translation is identified in accordance with the configuration guidelines noted above. In step 103, the core translation is rendered into adapted framing characters. In step 104 the translation text is rendered into an embeddable translation text. In step 105, the embeddable foreign language text is overlain non-horizontal counter strokes of the adapted core translation framing characters to create an effect of being embedded into the count relevant counter strokes. In step 106, a comprise text of foreign language content and core translation are displayed in a single line and the non-core translation is displayed either above, below, to the side, or a combination of these positions in accordance with the variant embodiment.

It should be noted that processing steps set forth in processing steps of FIG. 15, in a certain embodiment these steps are implemented with the analogous steps set forth in counter filling embodiments set forth in FIGS. 10A and 10B.

It should be appreciated that the center and framing characters are displayed in accordance with the above-noted user selected font parameters, like color, treatment, font size.

Furthermore, in a certain embodiment employing a display screen, one of the character sets is displayed momentarily for a time-period like 2 seconds, 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 30 seconds, or even 60 seconds, for example; in accordance with configuration guidelines. Analogously, in another embodiment, a character set is displayed automatically until receipt of a user input terminating its display, also in accordance with configuration guidelines set either by a user, a manufacturer, or both.

User input is implemented either though a touch screen or through verbal instruction. In a certain embodiment, the engine tracks user usage and builds a user profile of viewing time, string correlations of interest, for example, and other parameters that can provide user interests and usage that is also leveraged by the engine to automatically provide user-specific functionality.

As noted, the composite text string advantageously reduces eye fatigue, thought interruption by displaying two different types of content strings within a field of vision single defined by single-line display thereby enabling near simultaneous viewing with a minimum amount of eye shift. Single-line display spans the area bound by the vertical extremities of the framing characters, in a certain embodiment.

As noted, the composite text string advantageously reduces eye fatigue, thought interruption by displaying two different types of content strings within a field of vision single defined by single-line display thereby enabling near simultaneous viewing with a minimum amount of eye shift. Single-line display spans the area bound by the vertical extremities of the framing characters, in a certain embodiment.

This rendering engine embodies a significant advance over existing rendering engines that lack the ability to display single-line composite texts in a manner devoid of clutter and character overlap that is also compliant with accepted legibility and readability norms.

FIG. 18 is a listing of lowercase English characters and sample distinguishing or discriminatory character strokes of each character that can be used to differentiate one character from another when a portion of the character stokes are absent, according to an embodiment. Sample distinguishing character strokes are highlighted of each character by box 110. As shown, distinguishing character strokes are a function of character geometry. In certain geometries, a distinguishing traversing the character width are shown in character “r” whereas, a distinguishing traversing character bound at the bottom by character baseline as shown in character “u”, for example. Certain characters possess two distinguishing traversing characters; one bound by a baseline and the other bound on the top by an x-height or median (As known by those skilled in the art of typography) as shown in characters “c” and “d”, for example.

Other characters possess three distinguishing traversing strokes. For example, the crossbar of “e” and the spine of “s” are distinguishing traversing strokes in addition to traversing distinguishing traversing bound by either a baseline and a or a an x-height. In certain other embodiments, the discriminatory or distinguishing feature does not traverse the width of the character and is implemented in the form of a descender as shown in character “y” or character “g”, for example. In certain other embodiments, the discriminatory feature includes an ascender as shown in characters “b” and “d”, for example. In a certain other embodiment, the discriminatory feature includes a descender as shown in character “q” for example.

It should be appreciated that uppercase English characters also possess distinguishing traversing strokes as do characters of various languages as will be further discussed.

Combinations of one or more distinguishing character strokes advantageously enable a reader to identify characters when other character strokes have been removed. Furthermore, a combination of distinguishing features of adjacent characters can be used by a reader to identify characters missing significant portions of their character strokes.

FIG. 19 depicts a first embodiment of composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text.

As shown, the composite text is formed from a foreign language and translation text which has been truncated to reduce stroke clutter. Character truncation is a process of removing various character strokes from a character thereby leaving the area vacated by the truncated character strokes and the area previously enclosed by them available for receiving foreign characters. This vacated space is referred to as a truncation area.

As noted above, composite text display schemes are directed to reducing eye shift between semantically related texts, like translations, for example. Linear translations are typically displayed in separate viewing fields that cause eye strain for readers compelled to repeatedly shift eyes from one text to another. The composite text indeed reduces eye shift; however, the abundance of character strokes associated with both texts displayed in a single viewing field can create clutter making it difficult for the reader to discern the foreign text from the translation text. Accordingly, FIG. 19 depicts an embodiment in which a significant portion of the translation text, English in this example, has been removed, or truncated. The remaining character strokes have a discriminatory geometry sufficient for an English language reader to recognize the character in the absence of all character strokes.

As shown, a foreign language text, Spanish in this example, is embedded within the area vacated through truncation of translation character strokes. Discriminatory character strokes of the associated truncated translation text disposed above and below the foreign text provide sufficient insight for an English language reader to identify the truncated characters and understand the truncated translation text.

For example, the Spanish word “chico” is embedded in the truncation area of its English translation. “boy”. An English language reader is easily able to recognize the translation “boy” based on the discriminatory strokes disposed above and below the foreign language. Specifically, every English reader can recognize the “b” based on the top stroke, can recognize the “o” based on the two curved strokes, and the “y” based on the bottom stroke. The remaining discriminatory strokes further reinforce identification of these characters. Looking at another example, the Spanish word “aeropuerto” can be easily translated into “airport” by an English langue reader based on the bottom stroke of the “a”, the dotted segment of the “i”, the top stroke of the “r”, the bottom stroke of the “p”, and the “crossbar” of the “t”, for example. Here too, the remaining strokes further reinforce identification of these characters for the reader.

The translation in certain embodiments is implemented in a font color lighter than the foreign text to reduce translation text visibility to facilitate reader focus on the foreign text only until the reader decides to view the translation.

In a certain embodiment, rendering engine 1 is configurable to set the shade of the translation text. In another embodiment, the shade of the translation text lightens in accordance with tracked reader usage to facilitate to facilitate gradual weaning from the translation text as foreign language competency grows. The tracking is implemented in a certain embodiment by associating a reader login and usage of the composite display feature and the rate of shade lightening is user configurable. In another embodiment, a user is able to disenable display of truncated translation text associated with foreign words or phrases for which he has sufficiently mastered.

Generally, this display scheme embodies an advance in composite display by reducing stroke clutter to enhance readability while still reducing eye shift between the two text strings.

FIG. 20 depicts a second embodiment of composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a truncation area above the bottom two discriminatory character strokes of the associated truncated translation text.

As shown, the truncated translation characters are identifiable based on one or two, of the lower discriminatory character strokes. For example, here “b” and “o” of “boy” are identifiable based on the bottom stroke whereas the “s” is identifiable based on two discriminatory character strokes, for example. It should be appreciated that in this and other embodiments, the foreign text is embedded in the truncation area enclosed by the character boundingbox and also area outside of the boundingbox.

FIG. 21 depicts a third embodiment of composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a truncation area below discriminatory character strokes of the truncated translation text. Character differentiation depends on either the uppermost or the top two discriminatory character strokes.

As shown, the “a” of “at” is identified by the middle and the top strokes whereas the “t” is identified based on the crossbar disposed at the top of the vertical stroke, for example.

FIG. 22 depicts a variant embodiment of that depicted in FIG. 21 in which a composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text. The foreign language text is embedded within a truncation area also below associated truncated translation text. However, the truncated translation text is displayed in a font size smaller than that of the foreign text. The reduced size of the translation text advantageously reduces stroke clutter while still reducing eye shift between the texts. It should be appreciated, that in other variant embodiments, the upper portion of the translation text is truncated and the foreign text is disposed in the resulting truncation area above the translation text.

FIG. 23 depicts a variant embodiment of a composite text of a foreign language text and a truncated translation text in which the foreign language text is embedded within a bordered truncation area below primary discriminatory character strokes of the truncated translation text. As shown, descenders can add additional character differentiation. In other variant embodiments, the bordered truncation area is disposed above the discriminatory character strokes, whereas in another variant embodiment, the bordered truncation area is disposed in between upper and lower discriminatory strokes.

FIG. 24 depicts a composite text analogous to FIG. 19 except that here English is treated as a foreign language text and Hebrew is treated as a truncated translation text, according to an embodiment. The language to be treated as a foreign language and the translation text is entirely configurable. Rendering engine 1 has a pre-defined data file truncated translation data 19B (Shown in FIG. 2) of truncated translation characters in accordance with the embodiment to be employed. For example, embodiments employing upper and lower discriminatory strokes, bound by x-height and baseline, respectively, the translation characters of the translation text are replaced with pre-defined truncated translation characters having a truncation area in between the upper and lower truncated discriminatory strokes. Analogously, embodiments employing the top two discriminatory strokes in which the upper stroke is bound by the x-height, the translation characters are replaced with predefined, truncated translation characters having a truncation area below the middle discriminatory stroke. Similarly, embodiments employing the bottom two discriminatory strokes in which the bottom stroke is bound by the baseline, the translation characters are replaced with truncated translation characters having a truncation area above the middle discriminatory stroke. This applies in any language configured to be a translation language. In a certain embodiment, the truncation is implemented in real time.

In an embodiment, the truncated translation characters are implemented as other forms of semantically related content like transliteration, for example. In another embodiment, the truncated characters are implemented as currency equivalents of the text, associated pricing, relevant telephone numbers, dates, or times. In another embodiment, the truncated content is implemented as advertising material or pictorial content related to the text.

FIG. 25 is a flow chart depicting processing steps employed in the implementation of display schemes embedding foreign language text within a truncation area of a translation text, according to an embodiment.

At step 120, rendering engine 1 receives a first text string that has been pre-identified as foreign text characters either by the user or another interested party. In step 122, rendering engine 1 obtains a second text string as a translation of the foreign text. In step 124, translation text characters are rendered into predefined truncated translation characters in accordance with the type of truncation to be employed. As noted above, when English is used as the translation text, there are three truncation possibilities; each one having discriminatory character strokes displayed at different character heights. Accordingly, the translation characters are replaced with a truncated translation characters in between the discriminatory character strokes, or below the discriminatory character strokes or above the discriminatory character strokes. In step 128, the resulting composite text is displayed or printed.

While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes, and equivalents will now occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention. 

1. A method for displaying a composite text string performed on a computer having a processor, memory, and one or more code sets stored in the memory and executed in the processor, the method comprising: receiving a string of foreign text characters; obtaining a translation text of the foreign language content; rendering the translation text into truncated translation characters; embedding the foreign text characters in area vacated through truncation of the translation text of the foreign text characters; and displaying a composite text of the foreign text characters and the truncated characters, the foreign text characters embedded in the area vacated through truncation of the translation text of the foreign text characters.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of the truncated translation characters include at least one discriminatory, character stroke.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one discriminatory, character stroke spans a width of the truncated character.
 4. The method of claim 2, wherein a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character x-height and a second stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character baseline.
 5. The method of claim 2, wherein a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character baseline.
 6. The method of claim 2, wherein a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character x-height.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the truncated translation characters are implemented in a color lighter than the foreign text characters.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the truncated characters are displayed in gray.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the color lightens in accordance with reader usage.
 10. A rendering engine for reducing clutter in composite-text display, the engine comprising: an input device configured to capture foreign language content; a processor operative to: render the foreign-language content into foreign text characters, obtain a translation text of the foreign-language content, render the translation text into a string of truncated translation characters; embed the foreign text characters in area vacated through truncation of the translation character of the translation text; and an output device configured to display a composite text of the foreign text characters and the truncated characters, the foreign text characters embedded in the space vacated through truncation of the translation text.
 11. The rendering engine of claim 10, wherein a plurality of the truncated translation characters include at least one discriminatory, character stroke.
 12. The rendering engine of claim 11, wherein the at least one discriminatory, character stroke spans a width of the truncated character.
 13. The rendering engine of claim 11, wherein the first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke at is disposed at a height bound by a character x-height and a second stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is disposed at a height bound by a character baseline.
 14. The rendering engine of claim 11, wherein a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character baseline.
 15. The rendering engine of claim 11, wherein a first stroke of the at least one discriminatory character stroke is bound by a character x-height.
 16. The rendering engine of claim 15, wherein the truncated translation text is implemented in a font size smaller than that of the foreign text characters.
 17. The rendering engine of claim 15, wherein the area vacated through truncation of the translation text is bordered.
 18. The rendering engine of claim 14, wherein the input device is implemented as a microphone or a camera
 19. The rendering engine of claim 14, wherein the output device is implemented as a printer or a display screen. 